|
|
|
NEBRASKA STATE CAPITOLS' AND THEIR HISTORY
The Nebraska State Capitol is recognized as one of the world's architectural masterpieces. What makes our Nebraska Capitol unique is that all of the art of the building (exterior and interior) is related. It all comes together to represent one great theme in a regular and definite sequence. The art is an integral part of the building. If one were to try and remove any of the art, it would destroy the building. For example:
The Nebraska State Capitol is in the form of a large Greek cross within a square topped with a tower. The arms of the cross are 437 feet long with the tower being 400 feet tall. The large base is said to represent the flat plains of Nebraska while the tower symbolizes the dreams and aspirations of the pioneers. Sitting on top of the tower is the Sower. The Sower serves as a reminder to Nebraskans that our state government will always sow the seeds of fortune for a good life. The design and style of the capitol is not a direct copy of any old or traditional art, but something strictly new and unique to Nebraskans:
The building was constructed over a ten-year period in five phases. Construction began in 1922 and completed in 1932. The total cost of the building was just under $10 million dollars. The building offers more useable space per dollar spent than any other building built for similar purposes in America. Nebraska Capitol Website: http://www.capitol.org
The building, furnishings and landscaping cost just less than the $10 million budget. The money was secured by a special capitol levy, and the building was paid for upon completion in 1932. The four-phase construction was completed in 10 years under the supervision of William Younkin of the architect's office. The building's construction was overseen by the Capitol Commission composed of the governor, the state engineer and three members appointed by the governor. The appointed members were W.E. Hardy of Lincoln, W.H. Thompson of Grand Island and Walter H. Head of Omaha. Samuel R. McKelvie, Charles W. Bryan, Adam McMullen and Arthur J. Weaver were governors during construction and chairmen of the commission. The state engineers were George E. Johnson and Robert L. Cochran while Thomas R. Kimball of Omaha was the commission's professional advisor. Kimball wrote the terms of how the building's architect was to be chosen. Nebraska's capitol has been honored by the U.S. National Park Service, the American Institute of Architects, the Building Stone Institute and other organizations. But perhaps its greatest tribute is the respect demanded for the building's care and preservation by those it serves, the citizens of Nebraska. The History of Nebraska's Unicameral Legislature The Birth of a Unicameral Nebraskas legislature is unique among all state legislatures in the nation because it has a single-house system. It wasnt always a unicameral, however. George Norris George Norris, a "New Deal Republican" who settled in McCook, wore out two sets of tires while he drove throughout the state campaigning for the measure. He said the two-house system was outdated, inefficient and unnecessary.
"...The constitutions of our various states are built upon the idea that there is but one class. If this be true, there is no sense or reason in having the same thing done twice, especially if it is to be done by two bodies of men elected in the same way and having the same jurisdiction." The one-house system differs little from most city, county and school district governing bodies. Most Canadian provinces operate with single-house systems. Norris's influence, the Depression and the other ballot issues summoned enough supporters for an overwhelming decision to make Nebraska's the only one-house legislature in the nation. The vote was 286,086 for and 193,152 against a unicameral system. Checks and Balances A common question regarding unicameralism was how to preserve checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. Norris argued there would be checks and balances without a second house. The Supreme Court and the governor would rule on or veto measures deemed improper, he said. More importantly, the people would serve as a check upon the possible abuse of power by their elected officials with the right to vote and petition, Norris said. The Nebraska Unicameral would have easy-to-follow procedures and extend greater privileges to the press to allow for greater public awareness. "Every act of the legislature and every act of each individual must be transacted in the spotlight of publicity," Norris said. In a one-house legislature, Norris said, no actions could be concealed as was commonly done in the conference committee of bicameral legislatures. Conference committees resolve differences when bills passed in both houses vary in content. In Nebraska, the appointed six-member committee met in secret and members votes were not public record. Norris said these committees had too much power and could be influenced easily by lobbyists. Once a bill came out of the conference committee, it could not be changed, only approved or rejected. If rejected, another committee had to be formed to work out the disagreements or the measure failed. Today in Nebraska, lawmakers may propose amendments and debate them outside of committee on the chamber floor. Some say a two-house system with its conference committee prevents hasty legislation. But the unicameral system has safeguards against this possibility. Most bills must get a public hearing; five days must elapse between a bills introduction and its passage; and bills can contain only one subject. Results
Implementation of the unicameral legislature in 1937 cut government costs for obvious reasons. Legislative membership went from 133 in the bicameral to 43 in the new single house nearly a 70 percent reduction. Also, the one-house system was more efficient than its predecessor. The number of committees was pared down from 61 to 18, and 581 bills were introduced in 1937 as opposed to twice that many the previous session. The last bicameral session in 1935 ran 110 days, passed 192 bills and cost $202,593. The first unicameral session two years later ran 98 days, passed 214 bills and cost $103,445. Nonpartisanship Another unique aspect of Nebraskas legislature is its nonpartisanship. Before becoming a unicameral, the Nebraska Legislature was a partisan one. The change to nonpartisanship was included in the successful 1934 unicameral amendment. Being a nonpartisan legislature means that a candidate's political party is not listed on the election ballot. The two candidates who obtain the most votes in the primary election face each other in the general election. In other states, each party selects a winner in the primary, and the winners of each party run against each other in the general election. Unlike other states, Nebraska's legislative leadership is not based on party affiliation. Norris, who advocated nonpartisanship said that such a body would allow senators to concentrate on local interests without being influenced by national party lines. National party lines, he argued, often have little to do with local government. A voter who votes according to party lines might vote for a state candidate who disagrees with him or her on matters over which the senator will have jurisdiction. Norris worked to eliminate partisanship in the legislature because he believed that elected officials would stand on their own records. Nonpartisanship would allow lawmakers to base their actions on their own convictions and the needs of their districts, rather than according to party dictates. Nebraska a Model Movements for unicameralism have existed throughout the United States since the nations independence. There were several pro-unicameral movements in the state before one finally succeeded. The same year Nebraskas unicameral legislature began operating, attempts in 21 other states to become one-house legislatures failed. Such efforts waned until the 1960s when a Supreme Court ruling revived the movement. It ruled that both houses must be apportioned according to population, instead of one house according to population and the other house according to geographical lines. The ruling raised doubts about the necessity of having two houses based on population, stirring many states to evaluate their own systems. Many states looked to Nebraska as a model of an effective one-house legislature. Those states included California, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee and Texas. Nebraska officials visited many states to spread the word about unicameralism. Journalists and officials from other states also visited Nebraska. The Unicamerals first clerk, Hugo Srb, predicted that lawmakers in other states would not want to legislate their own jobs out of existence. Despite the interest unicameralism has received over the years, Nebraska remains the only state with a unicameral legislature
|
|
Webmaster: Roger W. Miner at minerland@neb.rr.com
Last modified : January 1st, 2007
This page requires sound card to enjoy midi selections USE TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TO NEGOTIATE THIS SITE "COPYRIGHT" FEBRUARY 2005 MASONRY NEBRASKA |